From: Ben Santer To: David Douglass Subject: Re: Your manuscript with Peter Thorne Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 14:01:26 -0700 Reply-to: santer1@llnl.gov Cc: Christy John , "Thorne, Peter" Dr. Douglass: I assume that you are referring to the Santer et al. paper which has been submitted to the International Journal of Climatology (IJoc). Despite your claims to the contrary, the Santer et al. IJoC paper is not essential reading material in order to understand the arguments advanced by Peter Thorne (in his "News and View" piece on the Allen and Sherwood "Nature Geosciences" article). I note that you did not have the professional courtesy to provide me with any advance information about your 2007 IJoC paper, which was basically a commentary on previously-published work by myself and my colleagues. Neither I nor any of the authors of those previously-published works (the 2005 Santer et al. Science paper and the 2006 Karl et al. CCSP Report) had the opportunity to review your 2007 IJoC paper prior to its publication - presumably because you specifically requested that we should be excluded from consideration as possible reviewers. I see no conceivable reason why I should now send you an advance copy of my IJoC paper. Collegiality is not a one-way street, Professor Douglass. Sincerely, Dr. Ben Santer David Douglass wrote: > Dear Dr Santer > > In a recent paper by Peter Thorne in Nature Geoscience he references a > paper that you and he (and others) have written. > I can not understand some parts of the Thorne paper without reading the > Santer/Thorne reference. > Would you please send me a copy? > > Sincerely; > David Douglass -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Benjamin D. Santer Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory P.O. Box 808, Mail Stop L-103 Livermore, CA 94550, U.S.A. Tel: (925) 422-2486 FAX: (925) 422-7675 email: santer1@llnl.gov ----------------------------------------------------------------------------